THE DILEMMA OF LIMITED SOVEREIGNTY AS A CHALLENGE TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGULATION OF FROZEN CONFLICTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-1815/2025-21-20Keywords:
frozen conflicts, sovereignty, international conflict resolution, European Union, international organizationsAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the phenomenon of limited sovereignty as a key challenge in the settlement of frozen conflicts in the post-Soviet space. The authors analyze the concept of sovereignty through the prism of international law and theories of international relations, emphasizing the differences between formal authority and effective control, which determines the existence of «zones of limited statehood». Particular attention is paid to the Georgian case, where international mediation, in particular through the agreements of 1992 and 1994, institutionalized political non-settlement and consolidated the pattern of a stalemate. The article shows how peacekeeping interventions, despite the intention of stabilization, create conditions for the preservation of the conflict, providing the parties with resources and legitimacy, while at the same time increasing dependence on external actors. The decisions of the UN, EU and CIS are analyzed, which, by effectively legitimizing the Russian military presence, contributed to the consolidation of «gray zones» on the territory of Georgia. The authors emphasize the contradictory role of the EU and the US, which declared support for Georgia’s sovereignty, but in practice demonstrated concessions to Moscow in order to avoid confrontation. Particular attention is paid to the «Medvedev-Sarkozy Plan» of 2008, which ended the hot phase of the war, but was not ratified and left the conflict legally unsettled. The work concludes that the lack of effective mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of agreements, disagreements between the positions of international institutions and tolerance of the participation of the patron state in peacekeeping processes create conditions for a persistent limitation of sovereignty. This calls into question the effectiveness of the modern architecture of international security in resolving frozen conflicts and requires the development of new approaches to ensuring the territorial integrity of states.
References
Sovereignty. Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/sovereignty
Krasner S. D. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. 1999.
Risse T. Governance Under Limited Sovereignty. APSA Annual Meeting Paper. SSRN. 2010. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1642081
Purposes and Principles of the UN (Chapter I of UN Charter). Security Council. United Nations. URL: https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/content/purposes-and-principles-un-chapter-i-un-charter
United Nations Charter. United Nations. URL: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
Pogodda S., Richmond O.P., & Visoka G. Counter-peace: From isolated blockages in peace processes to systemic patterns. Review of International Studies. 2022. № 49(3). Pp. 1–22. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210522000377
Bell C., & Pospisil J. Navigating Inclusion in Transitions from Conflict: The Formalized Political Unsettlement. Journal of International Development. 2017. № 29(5). pp. 576–593. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3283
Marking 16 Years Since Russia’s Invasion of Georgia. U.S. Embassy in Georgia. 2024. URL: https://ge.usembassy.gov/sixteen-years-georgia-russia-invasion/
Agreement on Principles of Settlement of the Georgian – Ossetian Conflict (Sochi Agreement). United Nations. URL: https://peacemaker.un.org/en/node/8949
Agreement on a Cease-Fire and Separation of Forces, signed in Moscow on 14 May 1994. UN Peacemaker. 1994. URL: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/default/files/document/files/2024/05/ge940514agreementceasefireseparationofforces.pdf
Francis C. Conflict resolution and status: the case of Georgia and Abkhazia (1989–2008). Vubpress. 2011.
Resolution 937: adopted by the Security Council at its 3407th meeting. United Nations Digital Library System. URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/190853?v=pdf
Item 8: The Situation In Georgia. Decision of 29 January 1993 (3169th meeting): statement by the President. United Nations. URL: https://www.un.org/french/docs/cs/repertoire/93-95/CHAPTER%208/EUROPE/item_8_Georgia.pdf
Groups of Friends of Georgia. International Center of Conflict and Negotiations. 2024. URL: https://iccn.ge/index.php?article_id=551&clang=1
Whitfield T. Friends Indeed? US Institute of Peace Press. 2007.
Resolution 1716: adopted by the Security Council at its 5549th meeting. Security Council. 2006. URL: https://docs.un.org/en/S/RES/1716%20(2006)
Feichtinger W. Failed prevention : the case of Georgia. 2010. URL: https://www.bmlv.gv.at/pdf_pool/publikationen/pfp_rssc_georgia_prevention.pdf
Cologne European Council 3–4 June 1999. Presidency conclusions and annexes. Archive of European Integration. URL: https://aei.pitt.edu/43336/
Georgia. Country Strategy Paper 2007–2013. European Commission. European Neighborhood and Partnership Instrument. URL: https://www.esiweb.org/pdf/georgia_EC-ENPI-Georgia-2007-2013.pdf
EU/Georgia Action Plan. European Commission. 2006. URL: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/georgia_enp_ap_final_en_0.pdf
Whitman R., & Wolff S. The European Union as a Global Conflict Manager. Routledge. 2012.
Joint Statement of the Group of Friends of Georgia at the 30th OSCE Ministerial Council Meeting. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia. 2023. URL: https://mfa.gov.ge/pfiles/files/mcdel0019%20joint%20GoF%20of%20Georgia.pdf
Six Point Peace Plan. Government of Georgia. 2008. URL: https://smr.gov.ge/uploads/prev/9bbbc7.pdf 24. Letter from Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy on the six-point ceasefire agreement. NATO Parliamentary Assembly. 2008. URL: https://www.ft.dk/samling/20081/almdel/NPA/bilag/6/603930.pdf
Phillips D. Implementation Review: Six-Point Ceasefire Agreement Between Russia And Georgia. National Committee on American Foreign Policy. 2011. URL: https://ncafp.org/2016/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/implementation-review-russia-and-georgia-aug2011.pdf
Security Council steps back from French-led draft resolution, as russian delegate says it re-interpreted «Moscow peace plan» for propaganda purposes. Security Council. 2008. URL: https://press.un.org/en/2008/sc9429.doc.htm
Janse D. Georgia and the Russian Aggression. SCEEUS Reports on Human Rights and Security in Eastern Europe. Stockholm Centre for Eastern European Studies. 2021. URL: https://www.ui.se/globalassets/evenemang/bilder-till-programmen/sceeus/georgia-and-the-russian-aggression.pdf
Cease-fire has «translation problem». The Washington Times. 2008. URL: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/07/cease-fire-has-translation-problem/
Setting the Record Straight: President Bush Has Taken Action to Ensure Peace, Security and Humanitarian Aid in Georgia. Georgewbush-Whitehouse.archives.gov. URL: https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/08/20080813-2.html
Socor V. Analysis: Sarkozy-Medvedev plan flawed in substance and process. Eurasia Daily Monitor. 2008. URL: https://www.moldova.org/en/analysis-sarkozy-medvedev-plan-flawed-in-substance-andprocess-142313-eng/
«I Should Have Screamed More» – Saakashvili on 2008 War. Former President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili opens up over the disappointments, betrayals and deals made in the run-up to the 2008 war. Institute for War & Peace Reporting. 2019. URL: https://iwpr.net/global-voices/i-should-have-screamedmore-saakashvili-2008-war
Dickinson P. The 2008 Russo-Georgian War: Putin’s green light. Atlantic Council. 2021. URL: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/the-2008-russo-georgian-war-putins-green-light/
Case of Georgia v. Russia (Application no. 39611/18). The European Court of Human Rights. 2024. URL: https://www.refworld.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/case_of_georgia_v._russia_iv.pdf





