CONVERSION IN ENGLISH GEODETIC TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEM: STRUCTURAL, SEMANTIC AND FUNCTIONAL PECULIARITIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/folium/2026.9.12

Keywords:

English geodetic terminology, term, specialized language, conversion, zero derivation, word formation, term-building

Abstract

The article investigates conversion (zero derivation) as a productive mechanism of term formation in contemporary English geodetic terminology. The relevance of the research is determined by the rapid development of geodesy and digital surveying, which continuously enrich English professional vocabulary with new terminological units. The aim of the study is to identify structural, semantic, and functional characteristics of conversion in English geodetic terminological system, determine principal conversion patterns, and evaluate their role in the development of contemporary geodetic terminology. The research material consists of English geodetic terms extracted from specialized dictionaries and glossaries, state standards, technical documentation, and recent scientific publications in the field. The study employs descriptive, structural, semantic, functional, comparative, and quantitative methods of linguistic analysis. The investigation identified six basic conversion models in the structure of English geodetic terminology: Verb → Noun, Noun → Verb, Noun → Adjective, Adjective → Noun, Verb → Adjective, and Adjective → Verb. The findings demonstrate that Verb → Noun and Noun → Verb are the most productive patterns, serving to designate surveying operations, measurement procedures, technical processes, instruments, products, and measurement results. The study shows that conversion contributes to terminological economy, semantic transparency, lexical cohesion, and the systematic organization of English geodetic terminology while facilitating the efficient nomination of emerging concepts in the field of geodesy and surveying. The results confirm that zero derivation is a productive mechanism of terminology development in modern English geodetic terminology and reflects the close conceptual relationship between technical operations and their outcomes. The findings may be applied in terminology studies, lexicology, technical translation, English for Specific Purposes, and the standardization of professional vocabulary. Further research should focus on the functioning of converted terms in professional discourse and specialized linguistic corpora.

References

Azimbayeva, D. A. (2024). Conversion as a method of word formation in linguistics. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, Special Issue (Advancing Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis – Exploring Innovations), 78–80. URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd64802.pdf

Bauer, L., & Valera, S. (2026). On the borders of conversion. Folia Linguistica. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2025-0165

Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods and applications (J. C. Sager, Ed.; J. A. DeCesaris, Trans.). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.1

Chulieva Shakhnoza Oybek qizi, C. (2025). The types of word-formation in enriching vocabulary system of language. Web of Scientists and Scholars: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(1), 239–243. URL: https://webofjournals.com/index.php/12/article/view/3120

Hrybinyk, Y., Halai, T., Yesypenko, N., & Bloshchynskyi, I. (2022). Approaching metaphorical terms in subject-specific terminologies (Geologic and geodetic): Semantic and structural aspects. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 470–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n6p470

Hrybinyk, Y., & Sunko, N. (2023). The vocabulary of subject-specific terminologies: Peculiarities of composition and formation (Based on the English geodetic terminology). Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Seria Ştiinţe Filologice. Lingvistică, 45(1–2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.52846/aucssflingv.v45i1-2.91

Matthews, P. H. (2014). The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199675128.001.0001

Mishchenko, A. L. (2013). The linguistics of specialised languages and the modern model of scientific and technical translation. Nova Knyha.

Plag, I. (2003). Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press.

Vaneva, M., & Bojadjiev, M. I. (2020). English zero derivation revisited: Nouning and verbing in online business articles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(6), 307–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n6p307

Yankovets, O., Mitrousova, T., Svintsitska, O., Mychkovska, V., Bahrii, H., Herasimova, O., Mysechko, O., Isaieva, I., & Bloshchynskyi, I. (2023). Functions of the terminological units of English border terminology. World Journal of English Language, 13(1), 200–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p200

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Hrybinyk, Y., & Halai, T. (2026). CONVERSION IN ENGLISH GEODETIC TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEM: STRUCTURAL, SEMANTIC AND FUNCTIONAL PECULIARITIES. Folium, (9), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.32782/folium/2026.9.12

Issue

Section

Статті