PROSODIC PAUSE IN A FREE VERSE POEM READ ALOUD

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/folium/2024.4.22

Keywords:

prosodic pause, free verse, “The long hall” by Stevie Howell, Text World Theory, typography

Abstract

In free verse poetry, lines fulfill the function of rhythmic units. Line length, arrangement of lines on a page, the number of lines in a stanza, presence/ absence of punctuation marks depend on the author’s view on their semantic load. When a free verse poem is read aloud, its interpretation is revealed, among other features, through prosodic pauses, markers of boundaries between expressions which a reader believes to be relevant semantic units. This study discusses the results of a student-involved research project on the role of pauses in oral representations of “The long hall”, a free verse poem by contemporary Irish-Canadian author Stevie Howell. Four 4th year BA students of the English Philology Department at Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University performed as readers; two 1st year MA students of the same department carried out auditory analysis. The first recordings had been made before the poem was interpreted from the perspective of Text World Theory through building mental representations, text-worlds, which rely on the poem’s language and the participants’ general knowledge of the world. Having performed a text-world analysis of the poem, the readers recorded it again. The auditory analysis shows that building the poem’s text-worlds changes the angle of the discourse perception. In their first readings, the students typically focus on delimiting major syntactic constituents; pauses are mainly used as boundary markers between clauses and sentences. The second recordings show that the readers’ attention shifts to the semantic aspect of the poem: pauses (their places, types, and length) tend to correlate with the way the lines are arranged on the page, which can be regarded as deviation from grammatical norms; however, it creates a specific rhythm, highlights the semantic load of each line, and contributes to the emotional charge of the poem.

References

Бєлєхова Л. І. Інтерпретація поетичного тексту в когнітивному ракурсі. Нова філологія. Збірник наукових праць. Запоріжжя : ЗНУ, 2009. № 34. С. 12–18.

Дорофєєва М. С. Перекладознавчий аналіз поетичного тексту: принципи методи, перспективи (на матеріалі різномовних перекладів трагедії Й. В. Гете “Фауст”). URL: https://www.academia.edu/5695844/%D0%9F (дата звернення 21.02.2024).

Приходько І. В. Поетичний текст як особлива форма комунікації (на матеріалі англійськомовної канадійської поезії XVIII–XXI століть). Вчені записки ТНУ імені В. І. Вернадського. Серія: Філологія. Соціальні комунікації. 2018. Том 29 (68). № 1. С. 48–53.

Марчук Т., Мінцис Е. Лінгвопоетика та тематика англомовної пісенної лірики. Folium. Спецвипуск. 2023. C. 110–117. DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/folium/2023.3.16.24.

Andrews, R. A prosody of Free Verse: Explorations and Rhythm. New York and London : Routledge, 2017. 213 p.

Betz S., Bryhadyr N., Türk O., Wagner P. Cognitive Load Increases Spoken and Gestural Hesitation Frequency. Languages. 2023. Vol. 8. Iss.1: 71. 24 p. DOI https://doi.org./10.3390/languages8010071.

Cahnmann M. The Craft, Practice, and Possibility of Poetry in Educational Research. Educational Researcher. 2003. Vol 32. Iss. 3. P. 29–36. DOI https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032003029. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228848724_The_Craft_Practice_and_Possibility_of_Poetry_in_Educational_Research (дата звернення 15.12.2023).

Cruttenden A. Intonation. 2nd ed. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne : Cambridge University Press, 1997. 201 p.

Deese J. Pauses, Prosody and the Demands of Production in Language. Temporal Variables in Speech / eds. In H. W. Dechert, M. Raupach. The Hague, Paris, New York : Mouton Publishers, 1980. P. 69–84.

Gavins J. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2007. 193 p.

Gavins J. Poetry in the Mind: The Сognition of Contemporary Poetic Style. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2020. 167 p.

Igras-Cybulska M., Ziołko B., Źelasko P., Witkowski M. Structure of Pauses in Speech in the Context of Speaker Verification and Classification of Speech Type. EURASIP Journal of Audio, Speech and Music Processing. 2016. P. 1–16. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s13636-016-0096-7.

Krivokapić J. Prosodic Planning: Effects on Phrasal Lengths and Complexity on Pause Duration. Journal of Phonetics. 2007. Vol 35. Iss. 2. P. 162–179. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2006.04.001.

Krivokapić J., Styler W., Parrell B. Pause Postures: The Relatioship between Articulation and Cognitive Processes during Pauses. Journal of Phonetics. 2020. Vol. 79. P. 1–34. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.100953.

Männel C., Schipke C., Friederichi A. D. The Role of Pause as a Prosodic Boundary Marker: Language ERP Studies in German 3- and 6-year Olds. Developmental Cognitive Neurosciece. 2013. Vol. 5. P. 86–94.

Trouvain J., Werner R. Human Pause Detection in Spontaneous Speech in an Online Experiment. ESSV Konferenz Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung. Berlin, 3–5 März 2021. P. 59–66. URL: https://www.essv.de/pdf/2021_59_66.pdf?id=1101.

Trouvain J., Werner R. A phonetic view on annotating speech pauses and pause- internal phonetic particles. Transkription und Annotation gesprochener Sprache und multimodaler Interaktion / eds. C. Schwarze, S. Grawunder, S. Tübingen : Narr, 2022. P. 55–73.

Werth P. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. New York : Pearson Education, 1999. 390 p.

Published

2024-06-14

Issue

Section

Статті